Northern News Headlines
Entire Montana congressional delegation supports LWCF
Bakken crude oil trains from Mt, N.Dak. & Canada to Vancouver
Will rein in "dark money" so we know who paid for and how much
Institute For Justice still gives Mt grade of D in asset forfeitures
Two Moon area considered sacred to the Blackfeet indians
Montana State Fund shares good work-comp 2015 year
Sales could procede if lawsuits resolved on USFS land in Mt
W. R. Grace & Co. asbestos cleanup considered working
Initiaitive proposed to tax electicity to replace lower coal tax $
Gov. highlighting efforts to combate childhood hunger in Mt
Digits to digits = electronic claims process directly to the VA
State is reviewing criminal justice system to reverse the trends
Mt law requires inspection of 20% of group day cares annually
Will apply to the 2015 primary elections next June in Mt
NW Energy says Colstrip Power Plant would be closed early
U.S. Supreme Court says fed. gov't has the power, not states
Commissioner of Political Practices Motl calls it disingenuous
Blizzard like driving conditions & low visibility above 5k feet
Co-payments up, deductibles up, etc. due to increased costs
Mt and 4 other states already prohibit the internet gambling
Warns live fire training areas could be dangerous or fatal
Premiums are increasing in 14 affected Montana counties
Mission is to identify how many sexual assault kits there are
Violent crime dropped 25% from 2005 to 2014 in Montana
California's Cypress Creek Renewables to have 10 in Mt
RSS Feed 25 Latest Articles

Print View





“We continue to believe that we can accomplish more by working together on cost-effective, common-sense reform measures, rather than engaging in expensive and time-consuming litigation,” Cotter said.

Cotter wrote the commissioners on Feb. 26 – the same day the commissioners met with Van Valkenburg and expressed their concern that the “community has lost faith” in the office following a critical Feb. 14 report by the DOJ.

That document outlined deficiencies in Missoula County prosecutors’ handling of sexual assault cases, including a 17 percent prosecution rate of sexual assault cases.

In the letter, Cotter describes the success the DOJ has had with the University of Montana and the Missoula Police Department following similar reports on their work with victims of sexual assault.

The DOJ launched investigations into UM, the city and county in 2012. Both Missoula police and the UM Office of Public Safety entered into agreements with the Justice Department in May 2013, agreeing to changes in their handling of sexual assault reports.

“In contrast, the county attorney has refused to cooperate with our investigation from the outset,” Cotter wrote. “We have met with the county attorney several times and taken measures to address his expressed concerns regarding our investigation.”

The standoff between the DOJ and Van Valkenburg became even more entrenched at the beginning of the year, when Van Valkenburg sent a letter to the DOJ – rejecting their proposed settlement agreement and giving them two weeks to enter into “an amicable agreement” before he filed suit against the DOJ. When the Justice Department remained silent, Van Valkenburg filed for declaratory judgment in Missoula’s U.S. District Court, asking a federal judge to rule on whether the DOJ has jurisdiction over his office.

And the county commissioners furnished Van Valkenburg in his endeavors – releasing $50,000 of county funds for him to hire outside counsel to pursue the lawsuit.

Cotter wrote in his letter that the cost of litigation will “ultimately far outstrip the cost of reform.”

“We believe that the quickest and most effective way to protect women and improve the county attorney’s handling of sexual assault is a cooperative agreement,” Cotter wrote.


Commission Chair Jean Curtiss said Wednesday that her office is in the process of crafting a response to Cotter’s request, but said it’s not the commissioners’ responsibility to direct the affairs of another publicly elected official.

Instead, she said the DOJ should contact Montana Attorney General Tim Fox to work out an agreement, although that’s not likely.

“Between Fred and Mr. Cotter … I don’t think either one of them wants to settle,” Curtiss said.

In February, it also came to light the DOJ had entered into an agreement with former Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock, who is now governor, in 2012. Outlined in two letters, the agreement stipulated that the DOJ would share the findings of its investigations with the office.

During last week’s meeting with Van Valkenburg, Commissioner Michele Landquist said commissioners should have known about the agreement before releasing the funds Van Valkenburg requested to file suit against the DOJ.

“I can’t honestly say, knowing this, that I do support you going forward with any declaratory action,” she said at the meeting.

She said she saw the agreement as the attorney general giving the Justice Department the authority to investigate the County Attorney’s Office.

But Van Valkenburg, who has maintained that he has the support of both Bullock and Fox, said he didn’t see the letters as anything “of great consequence.”

Further, he denied attempting to mislead the commissioners by not providing them with copies of the agreement between

Landquist wouldn’t respond to questions Wednesday, but said in an email to the Missoulian that “this is a matter we take very seriously and we are working on our reply.



There are currently no comments, be the first to post one.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)


Enter the code shown above in the box below